Chrisitian Louboutin has lost an additional red sole-centred battle, this time against high-street chain Zara. The case erupted in 2011 when Louboutin sued Zara France for “counterfeiting and unfair competition” when they sold a 45 (49 euros) pair of red-soled, opened-toed shoes similar to Louboutin’s ‘Yo Yo’ design. Study: Christian Louboutin branches out into beauty The courts at first ruled in favour of Louboutin, on the Women’s Designer Shoes other hand Zara effectively appealed against the choice, and in June 2011 Christian Louboutin was ordered to pay Zara 2,016 (two,500 euros). Probably the most latest set-back could be the outcome of Christian Louboutin attractive the June 2011 ruling, in which Zara argued that “the terms of Louboutin’s trademark registration were as well vague, noting for instance that it didn’t include a Pantone christian louboutin madame butterfly colour reference for your red soles.” Last week, the French court upheld the ruling in favour of Zara, noting that “there was no established danger of confusion amongst Louboutin’s footwear as well as the Zara pair”, reports WWD . Alexis Mourot, group chief operating officer and common manager of Christian Louboutin, stated the firm would carry on defending its red soles, regardless of their most christian louboutin mater claude recent defeat: “Another red sole trademark application has been effectively registered and we will enforce this trademark against any infringers.” IN Photos: Chrisian Louboutin exhibition preview It really is one more blow for your famed French cordwainer in his tireless quest to trademark his red soles – he’s at present during the procedure of attractive a similarly drawn-out situation involving luxury trend home Yves Saint Laurent.